Thursday, December 15, 2011

The Principles of Sustainable Development.

Please watch a short video explaining the principles of SD by following the link below.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/harringtontw/2218451


1.        Education:
It is impossible to enact any sort of change in the world if no one understands what you are trying to change.  In order to create a world where Sustainable Development is a reality instead of an ideal people have to know what Sustainable Development really is and its many benefits.


http://www.storyofstuff.org/ Annie Leonard home page

2.       Personal Activism:
Every single person who steps in to make a difference counts.  Whether protesting an international corporation that dumps toxic waste into the ocean or a local business that doesn’t recycle every little step helps.  More important than resisting a single entity is pushing for policy change and that takes a large movement with many people at its back.

http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/4801/  Derrick Jensen “Forget Shorter Showers”

Battle in Seattle

3.       Corporate accountability:
Corporations across the world are destroying our environment.  It was once thought that the earth would act as an infinite dumping ground for our waste, but corporations have pushed our planet far beyond its limits.  They have created rivers that catch fire and trash floes in the oceans so large that they extend to the horizon.  Corporate accountability means that we make corporations pay for their pollution and even clean up after themselves.



4.       Governmental responsibility to the people:
Does our government really do what is best for its citizens?  Or does it do what is best for whoever has the most money?  I think the answers to those questions are fairly obvious.  We need a government that does what is best for the people it supposedly represents.  A government responsible to its constituents would not continue to allow things like clear cutting, water pollution, and coal burning.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2011/10/03/141014592/denmark-taxes-butter-and-fat-but-will-it-work  April Fulton “Denmark Taxes Butter And Fat, But Will It Work?”

http://www.medialit.org/reading-room/news-beyond-myth-objectivity Jay Davis “Beyond the Myth of Objectivity”

5.       Economic reform-crash course:
One of the biggest problems with our country is our economic system.  Our system is designed to continuously grow even though this has been proven impossible.  At some point the planet will run out of fossil fuels and the type of heavy metals that are used in industrial production, but our we expect our economy to continue to grow when this happens?  This seems fairly idiotic, but many economic “experts” continue to lobby for more economic growth.  All they are accomplishing is increasing the rate at which we destroy our world.

http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/5502 Eric Zencey “Theses on Sustainable Development” number five

http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/299/ Wendell Berry “The Idea of a Local Economy”

6.       Dollar voting:
One of the simplest ways to make a difference is to buy more sustainable products.  If everyone stopped buying feedlot beef tomorrow then feedlots would close almost immediately.  The idea here is to buy better food in an effort to support it and to cut the profits of companies that are based on animal cruelty, companies who clip chickens beaks and don’t let cows even move until they are ready to be slaughtered.


Joel Salaltin “Declare Your Independence”

7.       Understanding Media:
The majority of mainstream media is owned by only five or six companies.  These companies can control what gets aired on the news and can support specific political positions and views.  Most of, if not all, their stories are poorly represented and biased.  Media can no longer be trusted to give us accurate information on current events and political debates.  It has to be analyzed for bias one sidedness.




8.       Investing in the future:
Instead of harvesting coal from the mountains of Appalachia, why don’t we build a network of wind turbines on them that will provide steady power and jobs to our nation for hundreds of years?  Investing in the future is simple and fairly easy, but gets shut down by companies that are acting on short term goals.  Our country needs to become more self sufficient and the best way to do that is to fund alternative energy research and development.


http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/4809/  Erik Reece “Hell Yeah, We Want Windmills”

9.       Environmental Protection:
I find this one fairly obvious.  Our consumer lifestyles are destroying the environment quite rapidly.  We throw our trash in gigantic piles on the ground, blow up mountains to mine coal, and clear cut thousands of acres to create farmland and harvest timber.  We need to find some way to halt and reverse the destruction that is all around us.  Our planet can only continue to support life if we protect and heal it.



10.   Redefining success:
It is fairly clear what the average American associates with success.  We tend to focus on making money so that we can buy a nice house and raise a family in comfort.  By focusing on monetary success we often forget about our actual happiness.  Every person should eventually create their own definition of success instead of accepting what society has told us is successful.  The United States is one of the wealthiest nations in the world, but its people are often considered some of the least happy.  Redefining success is important because it helps slow down our frantic consumerism.

http://www.altruists.org/static/files/Buddhist%20Economics.htm  E.F. Schumacher “Buddhist Economics”

Monday, December 5, 2011

Mainstream Lies

                An extremely anti-mainstream media news site named NaturalNews featured an article detailing how the mainstream news downplayed the nuclear crisis in Japan by lying about the severity of the crisis, even as the crisis worsened.  The article titled “Mainstream media halts accurate reporting on Japan's worsening nuclear catastrophe; disinfo campaign now underway,” was one of the most clearly biased articles I have ever read.  It made unbacked claims about the lies the media was supposedly feeding us.  The only articles it referenced for its information were other articles on their own site or other sites like NaturalNews.  They claim that the news stopped reporting problems with the nuclear plant in Japan because the company that owns the news, General Electric, also owns the nuclear power plants in the U.S.  It is possible that General Electric does hold shares in both, but the rest of the story is simply ridiculous.  NaturalNews fabricates a story behind assumptions and opinions then throws in half-truths to make it seem credible. 
                I find the way that NaturalNews attempts to display media bias is horrible.  In creating fake stories about the mainstream media they become exactly what they are protesting.  I have studied the way that media is linked to democracy in my Sustainable Development class.  We found that most mainstream media sites have a very definite bias towards one viewpoint or another.  They would often bring on highly opinionated “experts,” on a subject, but only if that expert agreed with their views.  I do believe that we need news sources that can present other viewpoints in more nonbiased ways, but we do not need news sources specifically designed to prove how horrible a specific type of news is. 
                What the media shows to the public has become a very large part of politics.  Certain news programs are known for having one bias or another and the people know this is true.  The people compare what two different sources say about the same issue and then come to their own opinion.  Mainstream media self balances itself fairly well because everyone knows it’s biased.  Having news sites that are anti-bias creates news sites that people tend to believe present only facts, but by definition that news source is biased.  People can more easily fall into following one viewpoint because they no longer realize that there are other viewpoints.  In a way, shutting down mainstream media is like shutting down the different party’s voices.  The media is where they get to argue and debate about the issues they must deal with.  While arguing probably isn’t the best way to get things done, it does make sure that at least a few sides get heard.  When you try so hard to present a different opinion about a subject you create an opinion that goes unquestioned.  The core of democracy is that people do tend to question others views and opinions, by shutting down all but one opinion you are almost shutting down democracy.
                I know that no one really wants to shut down democracy, but the article is so biased that it presented a totally different side to the media argument to me.  It is easy to see the media debate as severely two-sided, because there are often only two sides shown, the same as many other issues.  The problem is that when you think about it in that way you are doing exactly what you shouldn’t.  The issue has been narrowed down and simplified into a two way split.  The obvious bias of the article made me realize that we almost automatically make subjects two sided and ignore the rest.  Media does need to portray more views, but we also need to check ourselves from time to time to make sure that we are still actually comparing the opinions and looking at an issue from many angles.

                The article can be found at http://www.naturalnews.com/031748_mainstream_media_nuclear_catastrophe.html                

Back to Credit

                A report done by Fox News states that credit card use is on the rise again.  Only three years after the United States big recession and credit card use is up by %10 when compared to last year.  Fox News speculates that this increase in credit card use is possibly due to banks cancelling their perks and reward points on debit cards and due to lower income families needing to pay for food and gas with credit because they don’t have enough cash on hand.  Fox portrays this credit increase in a very positive way that shows none of the problems with the trend.  They say that this trend will allow retailers to continue to grow over the holiday season which will in turn boost the economy. 
                I agree with Fox News in that the increasing credit trend will give the economy a little boost this holiday season, but what about after a year or two, when people are suddenly struggling to pay off their debt accumulated through high interest rates?  Will the current credit boom cause another recession later on?  There is no way to be sure about anything in the future, but I personally don’t see this as a good thing.  There are too many people out there who don’t understand how to properly save and invest their money and who don’t really understand how a credit card works.  These are the people who are likely to find themselves all of a sudden in a massive amount of debt because they have only been making minimum payments.   As their debt increases, so do their minimum payments, possibly to the point that they struggle just to pay that from month to month while they continue to use their credit cards because now all of their cash is going directly towards paying off the minimum payment.  When this happens the card holder eventually cannot pay of their debt, forcing the bank to take action. 
                When we studied the causes of the recession and the way the world’s economy works in our “Rethinking the American Economy,” section of my Sustainable Development class we saw a similar trend in the housing market.  People were buying homes with loans that they didn’t understand and couldn’t pay off.  This caused them to default on their loans and the banks to foreclose on them.  The loss of so much of the banks money and the foreclosure of so many houses caused the housing market to collapse leading to our recent recession.  I can see the same sort of thing happening with credit cards.  As people see the economy slowly improving they will become more willing to take risks and buy products that they can’t actually afford.  This could lead to a crash in the debit card market very similar to what occurred in the housing market three years ago.  Again this is all speculative, but I think, very possible. 
                Fox News never says any of this.  They quickly gloss over the idea that it might be a bad thing in the long run at the very beginning of the news clip then speak exclusively about how much this will benefit large corporate retailers.  They even directly state that people are using credit cards because they cannot actually pay for things, and then twist that fact into something positive.  This news clip was very obviously made to make the consumer feel confident enough to buy more even if they can’t afford to.  It clearly supports large retailers with no regard to the little man.